IMU coordinate system question




This forum is dedicated to questions regarding Challenge 3

IMU coordinate system question

Postby fog » Wed 1. Oct 2014, 13:38

Hi,
the coordinate system of IMU measurements seems rotated to us. Does it really follow the conventions described in the instructions document X-front, Y-left, Z-up?
It seems to us that X is up.

Second question - in the callback function do we return the position in the coordinate system of IMU?

Thanks.
fog
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed 3. Sep 2014, 08:50

by Advertising » Wed 1. Oct 2014, 13:38

Advertising
 

Re: IMU coordinate system question

Postby markusachtelik » Tue 7. Oct 2014, 15:54

Hi,

the alignment of the IMU is a bit different for task 1 and task 2. Only the alignment of the IMU w.r.t. the camera matters, which you can find in the contestant VM in the workspace in euroc_solution_t1/resource/calibration.yaml

maybe this discussion also helps:
http://euroc.iphpbb3.com/forum/20112706nx57588/challenge-3-f5/task-1-reference-frame-definition-t15.html
markusachtelik
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon 7. Jul 2014, 20:09

Re: IMU coordinate system question

Postby OmariSammy » Tue 7. Oct 2014, 16:47

Hi,

The technical annex might be a bit misleading in this regard. With X-front, Y-left, Z-up, we simply mean the right-hand chirality of the coordinate frame. The initial orientation of the IMU in a world frame is to be estimated by you. As well known from visual-inertial state estimation literature, roll and pitch angle of the IMU is observable. You can set the yaw, which is unobservable, to an arbitrary value. As discussed in the link that Markus provided, we only evaluate the relative position and orientation. Therefore, you can set the initial pose to an arbitrary value - it does not even have to be gravity aligned, as long as your estimated trajectory is consistent with respect to your initial pose.
OmariSammy
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue 7. Oct 2014, 16:11


Return to Challenge 3

Who is online

No registered users

cron